POWER MUST ANSWER.
Featured Document-based feature and analysis
A dispute over pretzel challah produced a settlement, a contested document and a lawsuit against an Orthodox rabbinical court. The lawsuit failed. Its path through the civil courts reveals the distance between challenging a monetary award and holding the people who administered the process liable.
A dispute over pretzel challah produced a settlement, a contested document and a lawsuit against an Orthodox rabbinical court. The lawsuit failed. Its path through the civil courts reveals the distance between challenging a monetary award and holding the people who administered the process liable.
USA Gymnastics received a warning in June 2015. The FBI received allegations the following month. Larry Nassar continued treating children elsewhere. Congressional and inspector general investigations reveal how private authority, narrow referrals and missing records failed the athletes the Olympic system was supposed to protect.
Federal auditors watched contractors inspect immigration detention facilities. They found hurried interviews, unsupported assurances and a complaint hotline reported as working before it was fixed. A second investigation followed the findings into the contracts, where penalties were rare and exceptions could outlast the rules they displaced.
Before the National Arbitration Forum stopped handling consumer debt arbitrations, creditors had built a private courthouse around credit card contracts, collection lawyers, repeat filings, and a promise of neutrality the public could barely test.
Three children were handcuffed during a Michigan custody dispute. Later, their living arrangements changed without the required hearing. The resulting court decisions expose a difficult accountability problem: correcting an order cannot return the time a family has already lived under it.
A Senate investigation found falsified safety records, missing therapy documentation and repeated staffing failures inside private youth treatment facilities. The public agencies paying for care had rules. The children needed those rules to work.
A beis din's family award reached into custody, support, property and a criminal complaint. New York courts rejected it. The case shows why a parent's signature cannot answer every question about a child's welfare.